Preview

Vestnik natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo yadernogo universiteta "MIFI"

Advanced search

Prediction of the Levelized Cost of Electricity for Nuclear Power Plants with Different Nuclear Reactors

https://doi.org/10.56304/S2304487X20040033

Abstract

   The levelized cost of electricity for nuclear power plants with different types of nuclear reactors has been predicted taking into account the uncertainty in the cost data on the construction and operation of reactor facilities, as well as the uncertainty in the cost data on fuel cycle products and services. Three types of thermal reactors operating in the once-through fuel cycle are considered (two options of spent fuel management are analyzed including the long-term storage of spent fuel at the away-from-reactor storage facility and final geological disposal of spent fuel), as well as four types of fast reactors operating in a closed uranium–plutonium fuel cycle. The estimation of probable LCOE values for various thermal and fast reactor technologies shows that the spread in possible LCOE values for different types of fast reactors turns out to be comparable and largely overlaps with the spread in LCOE values for thermal reactors. This suggests that, based on the LCOE estimations, taking into account the uncertainty in their values caused by the spreads in fuel cycle unit service cost and costs for the construction, operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants, it is impossible to make an unequivocal conclusion about the greatest attraction of any fast reactor concept, relying only on the LCOE analysis, and it is also incorrect to make statements about the lower economic performance of fast reactors as compared to thermal reactors: the corresponding statements should be considered solely as probabilistic ones.

About the Authors

D. V. Kovganko
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation

115409

Moscow



A. A. Andrianov
Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Russian Federation

249033

Obninsk



References

1. IAEA. INPRO Methodology for Sustainability Assessment of Nuclear Energy Systems: Economics / IAEA Nuclear Energy Series // No. NG-T-4.4, Vienna, 2014.

2. Cost estimating guidelines for GENERATION IV nuclear energy systems. Revision 4.2 / September 26, 2007.

3. IAEA. Technical Reports Economic Evaluation of Bids for Nuclear Power Plants. Series. No 396. 224 p. Vienna. 2000.

4. Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis – 2017 Edition, INL/EXT-17-43826. 2017.

5. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Framework for Assessing Dynamic Nuclear Energy Systems for Sustainability, Final Report of the INPRO Collaborative Project on Global Architectures of Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems with Thermal and Fast Reactors and a Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle (GAINS), IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-1.14. 2013.

6. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Nuclear energy development in the 21st century: global scenarios and regional trends, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-1.8. 2010.

7. Andrianov A. A., Korovin Yu. A., Kuptsov I. S., Murogov V. M., Andrianova O. N. K voprosu ob uchete ekonomicheskikh riskov pri sravnitel’nom analize yadernykh tekhnologiy razlichnoy stepeni zrelosti [Comparative evaluation of nuclear reactor technologies of different maturity levels on economic risk measures]. Izvestiya vuzov. Yadernaya Energetika, 2017, vol. 1, pp.156–168 (in Russian).

8. Andrianov A. A., Kuptsov I. S., Osipova T. A., Andrianova O. N. Sravnitel’nyy analiz investitsionnoy privlekatel’nosti energoblokov AES na baze reaktornykh moduley maloy i sredney moshchnosti i reaktora bol’shoy moshchnosti [Comparative analysis of the investment attractiveness of nuclear power plant concepts based on small and medium sized reactor modules and a large nuclear reactor], Izvestiya vuzov. Yadernaya Energetika, 2018, no. 4, pp. 89–101 (in Russian).

9. https://datavizcatalogue.com/RU/metody/diagramma_razmaha.html (accessed 13. 03. 20)

10. https://twitter.com/gilbeaq/status/814873872013082624 (accessed 10. 02. 20)

11. Expansion Planning for Electrical Generating Systems: A Guidebook. Technical Reports Series No. 241, Vienna (1984).

12. Kuznetsov V., Fesenko G., Schwenk-Ferrero A., Andrianov A., Kuptsov I. Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems: State-of-the Art Survey on Evaluation and Aggregation Judgment Measures Applied to Performance Comparison. Energies, 2015, no. 8, pp. 3679–3719.


Review

For citations:


Kovganko D.V., Andrianov A.A. Prediction of the Levelized Cost of Electricity for Nuclear Power Plants with Different Nuclear Reactors. Vestnik natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo yadernogo universiteta "MIFI". 2020;9(4):368-375. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56304/S2304487X20040033

Views: 117


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-487X (Print)